Hey there! This is a 🔒 subscriber-only edition of ADPList’s newsletter 🔒 designed to make you a better designer and leader. Members get access to exceptional leaders' proven strategies, tactics, and wisdom. For more: Get free 1:1 advisory | Become an ADPList Ambassador | Become a sponsor | Submit a guest post
🎉 Announcement of Design + AI Guide.
We’re excited to announce something special… Our first-ever guidebook, “Design by Intelligence.” It’s a field guide for the modern designer navigating the AI era. This isn't just theory, it’s practical, proven, and actionable. Inside, you’ll find a curated AI design stack, prompt systems designed for real-world use, and a 30-day roadmap to help you evolve into an AI-native designer. We built this for the curious, the ambitious, and the ones ready to shape what comes next.
This guidebook is more than a resource, it’s a mindset shift. We've spoken to founders, designers, marketers, and technologists who are already integrating AI into their creative workflows. What we found was clear: those who understand how to harness these tools are not just keeping up they’re leading. Design by Intelligence is your invitation to join them👇
Would you accept 50% pay cut for 5x growth?
Friends,
While scrolling through Reddit career threads and startup founder posts on LinkedIn, I stumbled upon a question that sparked a heated debate:
Would you take a 50% pay cut today for a role that promises 5x growth in skills, exposure, or future salary within the next 3–5 years?
Honestly, it’s the kind of question that divides a room instantly.
On one side, there are the pragmatic voices saying, “A job is to pay the bills. Why gamble with my livelihood?” And on the other, there are the risk-takers saying, “If the long-term payoff is huge, I’ll take the hit now.”
I thought about it myself & as always I asked others. I put out a simple 3-question survey:
Would you accept a 50% pay cut for massive future growth?
What would make you say yes?
What scares you about taking that leap?
Within 48 hours, 213 professionals responded—ranging from early-career grads to mid-level managers and even a few startup founders.
Here’s what they said:
41% said YES, but with a caveat: only if the company had a proven track record of employee growth, access to mentorship, or exposure to top-tier networks.
36% said NO, citing real-world barriers like financial obligations, EMIs, and a general distrust in vague “future promises.”
23% were on the fence. They’d consider it depending on factors like how steep the learning curve is, the credibility of the leadership team, and whether the industry was in high-growth mode.
These responses led me to dig deeper.
And here’s what shocked me the most:
📊 A joint study by LinkedIn and Harvard Business Review found that over 60% of professionals admit they regret prioritizing high pay over skill-building in their early 20s.
Most of them felt trapped in well-paying but stagnant roles—lacking purpose, learning, and any real momentum in their careers.
Think about that.
A significant majority of today’s workforce, especially those 30+ would undo their earlier choices if they could go back in time.
They would gladly trade a portion of their early salary for long-term career velocity whether it was to learn faster, build powerful networks, or be part of something game-changing.
Which begs the real question:
- Is taking a 50% pay cut truly a setback or the smartest long-term move you can make?
- Are we too focused on instant gratification to recognize exponential career compounding when it’s right in front of us?
That’s what this piece is about.
A deep dive into:
When a pay cut makes strategic sense
How to evaluate the growth opportunity (with real frameworks)
The risks you must watch out for
And stories of people who said yes—and came out ahead
Let’s break it down ⬇️
***
1. The psychology behind it
Before we dive into frameworks and decision models, let’s understand the emotional engine that drives this choice.
Honestly, this isn’t just a rational debate but it’s an emotional one.
On one side, the comfort of financial stability, predictable paychecks, and maintaining your current lifestyle, and on the other the uncertain promise of exponential career growth, exposure, learning, and future payoffs.
When I was talking to a few people about their choice, many of them said that it would be sacrificing immediate gratification like fewer luxuries now, saying no to weekend trips, living in a smaller apartment, swapping a brand-name company for an obscure startup.
It triggers a fight-or-flight response, especially if you’ve been conditioned to equate financial comfort with success or safety.
In my survey, I found out that the willingness to take a pay cut also depends heavily on where you are in life
Early 20s (Fresh Grads – Age 22–26):
Most people in this bracket are more open to taking risks. They’re eager to learn, hungry for mentorship, and haven’t yet built expensive lifestyles.Late 20s to Early 30s (Age 27–34):
This group is in transition. Some want to optimize for career compounding, but social pressures start to creep in EMIs, weddings, savings, and “settling down.”Mid to Late 30s (Age 35+):
The priority often shifts to stability, dependents, and wealth preservation. Even if a role offers exponential growth, the downside feels too steep.
Initially, anything significantly lower, even if it comes with growth potential, feels like a loss. Even if the new job offers 3x the opportunity and 10x the exposure, the brain still processes it as:
“I’m losing 50% of what I’m used to. That hurts.”
Understanding this bias is key to making smarter, more aligned career decisions.
***
2. Real data: who’s actually doing this?
It's easy to dismiss the idea of taking a 50% pay cut as unrealistic. But what do the numbers say?
Turns out, a lot more people are doing this than we think especially in the startup world, tech industry, and early-stage career moves. When you zoom out and analyze patterns in hiring, promotions, and long-term career progression, the data paints a compelling picture:
1. Startups thrive on sacrifice
According to Glassdoor, over 28% of startup employees knowingly accepted lower-than-market salaries in exchange for:
Equity ownership
Faster learning curves
Hands-on responsibility across departments
And why do they do it?
Because startups offer compressed learning environments. You’re not just doing your job but you’re building entire systems, launching new initiatives, wearing 3–4 hats at once.
The long-term reward: those same employees often exit with better titles, broader portfolios, or cash out when the startup succeeds.
2. Founders confirm the pattern
A First Round Capital survey revealed that:
57% of startup founders said their first 10 hires took significant pay cuts but eventually moved into Director or VP-level positions within 3–5 years.
That’s a huge signal.
It tells us that while the entry point is low, the trajectory is steep especially when you're closer to the action, decision-making, and core product-building.
3. Learning = Promotion engine
Harvard’s career development research tracked professionals who prioritized learning opportunities over pay increases.
Their finding?
Professionals who changed roles for growth and learning (not salary) were 2.5x more likely to be promoted within 5 years than those who made moves strictly for money.
That’s massive. The ones who took the pay-cut route often leapfrogged their peers in the long game.
Taking a pay cut isn’t as rare as it seems.
It’s just not as loudly discussed because our culture often equates success with salary size, not skill depth or future upside.
***
3. When a pay cut actually makes sense
Before you jump to conclusions understand that the key is to distinguish between short-term sacrifice for long-term upside vs. getting underpaid for work that won’t move the needle.
Here are 4 scenarios when taking a pay cut can be one of the smartest career decisions you make: